4th AAPHCE Abstract Template
The susceptibility of papaya to postharvest diseases is high. Fungal growth and anthracnose are considered one of the most significant. Synthetic fungicides are the most commonly used for 4th AAPHCE Abstract Template postharvest disease control. Nevertheless, these products have restricted application due to the negative effects on human health. 4th AAPHCE Abstract Template
4th AAPHCE Abstract Template The aim of this work was to study the effects of clean technologies as alternative for quality and pathology control during postharvest handling of papaya. Fruit were selected and subsequently treated with several clean technologies:
Mild Heat Treatment at 45°C for 5 minutes (MHT45), Mild Heat Treatment at 70°C for 1 minute (MHT70), Ultrasounds at ambient temperature for 10 minutes (USTA) and Ultrasounds at 50°C for 1 minute (US50). Additionally, non-treated fruit were used as control. 4th AAPHCE Abstract Template
After treatment, fruit were dried and stored at 8°C. Weight loss, respiration rates, firmness, aerobic mesophilic bacteria, mould, yeast counts, and anthracnose incidence were monitored after 0, 5, 14 and 21 days of storage.
Fruit treated with ultrasounds had an increase in respiration rate and weight loss, whilst the application of MHT lead to lower respiration rate and weight loss. Conversely, the treatments assessed, especially US50 and MHT70, resulted in fruit with higher firmness compared to the control.
After US50, MHT45 and MHT70 treatments followed by 21 days of storage, bacterial counts were 6.45, 5.79 and 7.21 cfu.g-1, respectively, versus counts of 9,95 cfu.g-1 for control fruit. These treatments also resulted in lower fungal counts of 4.95, 2.00 and 3.30 cfu.g-1 versus counts of 6.93 cfu.g-1 detected for control fruit. 4th AAPHCE Abstract Template
4th AAPHCE Abstract Template Consequently, the anthracnose visual incidence was reduced by up to 80% following the application of MHT treatment. Thus, the application of treatments such as MHT at 70°C might be a suitable alternative for the control of pathogens and enhancing postharvest quality of papaya fruit. 4th AAPHCE Abstract Template
The abstract should be written in English language in MS word or rich text format and have a maximum of 500 words in Times New Roman font size 12. The abstract MUST have the following details: GUIDELINES FOR ABSTRACT AUTHORS, 4th aaphce abstract, 4th AAPHCE Abstract Template
- Concise title (maximum 15 words)
- Names of authors, their affiliation and mailing address and the corresponding author contacts GUIDELINES FOR ABSTRACT AUTHORS, 4th aaphce abstract
- The body of the abstract should contain clear objective(s), methodology, results, discussion and conclusion/recommendations. GUIDELINES FOR ABSTRACT AUTHORS, 4th aaphce abstract
- Key words GUIDELINES FOR ABSTRACT AUTHORS, 4th aaphce abstract GUIDELINES FOR ABSTRACT AUTHORS
A template (sample abstract) is provided to guide the abstract authors to adhere to the guidelines provided above.
4th AAPHCE ABSTRACT AUTHORS, 4th aaphce GUIDELINES FOR ABSTRACT AUTHORS
The abstracts MUST be relevant to the congress theme, ‘Sustainable Postharvest Management: Boosting Intra-African Agricultural Trade and Enhancing Food and Nutrition Security’. The abstracts should be aligned to one or more of the following subthemes:
The congress will have a Four-day program where research and policy papers will be presented in joint sessions. The interactive sessions will feature lead papers from sector leaders, research papers, panel discussions and open plenary discussions. There will be dedicated interactive sessions for poster presentations where presenters will be allocated time to share their findings with participants.
- Unpacking food loss and waste: measurement, extent, drivers/causes, impact on food and nutrition security, environment, economies and livelihoods
- Preserving the harvest for food and nutrition security
- The role of postharvest management in facilitating trade and market access for increased profits and economic empowerment of food supply chain practitioners
- Capacity development of food supply chain actors for sustainable postharvest management
- Policy action, strategies and partnerships to realize AU’s Malabo 2025 and the UN’s 2030 food loss and waste reduction targets 4th AAPHCE Abstract Template
Priority will be given to papers that demonstrate practical solutions (technologies, practices, strategies) to food loss and waste reduction.
The abstracts submission can be made directly online at on the online platform at http://www.cvent.com/c/abstracts/a555eb06-e504-4f95-8429-26e545ff2276. If you experience difficulties in submitting through the online platform, you can submit the abstract as an attachment to the congress E-mail address: abstract@aaphce.com GUIDELINES FOR ABSTRACT AUTHORS Publication of Congress Papers GUIDELINES FOR ABSTRACT AUTHORS, 4th aaphce abstract Accepted abstracts will be published in the peer-reviewed congress book of abstracts.
Full papers from selected outstanding abstracts will be published in a special issue of the African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND). More details about AJFAND can be found on the journal website www.ajfand.net
4th AAPHCE 4TH All Africa PostHarvest Congress and Exhibition
4th All Africa Postharvest Congress and Exhibition (4th AAPHCE) was conceptualized as a pan-African platform where diverse stakeholders in the agri-food sector convene to share information and experiences and build partnerships that are required for sustainable 4th estate dod postharvest management and FLW reduction in the African context. 4th AAPHCE 4TH All Africa PostHarvest Congress and Exhibition, 4th estate datms login food systems summit We are happy to announce the 4th All Africa Postharvest Congress and Exhibition (4th AAPHCE). Save-the-Date for this important Pan-African event that is scheduled for 19th to 22nd September 2023. The 4th AAPHCE will be an in-person (physical) fourth estate congress hosted by the African Union Commission (AUC) at the African Union Headquarters list of dod 4th estate agencies 4th AAPHCE in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The congress is being organized by the AUC in collaboration with various partners, including development partners, private sector actors, academic/research institutions, and civil society.
4th AAPHCE 4TH All Africa PostHarvest Congress and Exhibition The 4th AAPHCE aka 4TH All Africa PostHarvest Congress and Exhibition is an unmissable platform for exhibitors to showcase their latest innovative technologies, practices, and tools for postharvest food loss/waste reduction. The congress will have a Four-day program where research and policy papers will be presented in joint sessions. The interactive sessions will feature lead papers from sector leaders, research papers, panel discussions and open plenary discussions.
There will be dedicated interactive sessions for poster presentations where presenters will be allocated time to share their findings with participants. The four-day congress is scheduled from 19th to 22nd September 2023 at the African Union (AU) Headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
The exhibition will be open 4th AAPHCE during the entire 4 daysin Parallel to the congress. An interactive session slot will be given to exhibitors to present their demonstration to the attendees. The exhibition must be aligned with the congress theme for ‘Sustainable Postharvest Management: Boosting Intra-African Agricultural Trade and Enhancing Food and Nutrition Security.‘
4th AAPHCE
4th AAPHCE The congress will have a Four-day program where research and policy papers will be presented in joint sessions. The interactive sessions will feature lead papers from sector leaders, research papers, panel discussions and open plenary discussions. There will be dedicated interactive sessions for poster presentations where presenters will be allocated time to share their findings with participants. 4th AAPHCE
Abstract Template
Clean Postharvest Technologies to Control Diseases in Fruit
(Abstract body text in 12-point Times New Roman, justified)
Rosita Umar Ubong1*, Kofi Abrakadabra2 and Abdulahi Kolo3
List all the co-authors starting with the first name, author names separated by a comma, each author’s institution/affiliation indicated by a superscripted number to the last name (surname), Add * to the presenting author
1Food Technology Development Agency, 1001 Research Street, Kisumu, Kenya; ruubong@gmail.com
2Department of Postharvest Management, University of Science and Technology, Akwa Iboma, Republic of Benin; taakum@usst.com
3International Organisation for Innovation, No-Food-Loss Street, Lilongwe, Malawi; akafrica@postharvestloss.com
*Presenting author
(Guided by the numbered superscript, list the author affiliation, full mailing address; email in 11-point Times New Roman, centered, italicized).
(Abstract body text in 12-point Times New Roman, justified – maximum 300 words)
The susceptibility of papaya to postharvest diseases is high. Fungal growth and anthracnose are considered one of the most significant. Synthetic fungicides are the most commonly used for postharvest disease control. Nevertheless, these products have restricted application due to the negative effects on human health. The aim of this work was to study the effects of clean technologies as alternative for quality and pathology control during postharvest handling of papaya. Fruit were selected and subsequently treated with several clean technologies: Mild Heat Treatment at 45°C for 5 minutes (MHT45), Mild Heat Treatment at 70°C for 1 minute (MHT70), Ultrasounds at ambient temperature for 10 minutes (USTA) and Ultrasounds at 50°C for 1 minute (US50). Additionally, non-treated fruit were used as control. After treatment, fruit were dried and stored at 8°C. Weight loss, respiration rates, firmness, aerobic mesophilic bacteria, mould, yeast counts and anthracnose incidence were monitored after 0, 5, 14 and 21 days of storage. Fruit treated with ultrasounds had an increase in respiration rate and weight loss, whilst the application of MHT lead to lower respiration rate and weight loss. Conversely, the treatments assessed, especially US50 and MHT70, resulted in fruit with higher firmness compared to the control. After US50, MHT45 and MHT70 treatments followed by 21 days of storage, bacterial counts were 6.45, 5.79 and 7.21 cfu.g-1, respectively, versus counts of 9,95 cfu.g-1 for control fruit. These treatments also resulted in lower fungal counts of 4.95, 2.00 and 3.30 cfu.g-1 versus counts of 6.93 cfu.g-1 detected for control fruit. Consequently, the anthracnose visual incidence was reduced by up to 80% following the application of MHT treatment. Thus, the application of treatments such as MHT at 70°C might be a suitable alternative for the control of pathogens and enhancing postharvest quality of papaya fruit.
Keywords: Clean technologies, anthracnose, postharvest quality, papaya
(Keywords: add a maximum of 5 keywords, in 12-point Times New Roman)